IN THE COURT OF(NAME),
MAGISTRATE IST CLASS, (CITY)
Qaisar Vs. The State.
Case FIR No.000/0000
U/S 337-F(v)/34 PPC
Police
Station: (name and city)
POST
ARREST BAIL PETITION.
ORDER.
Present: Learned
ADPP for the state.
Learned
counsel for the petitioner.
Learned
counsel for the complainant.
1. My
this order is meant to dispose off the above captioned, first bail petition,
(as per annexed certificate) filed by the accused person/petitioner in the
titled case through his counsel.
2. Briefly
stated prosecution story is that the accused persons, in furtherance of their
common intention, caused injuries to the victim, as detailed in FIR, hence this
case.
3. Learned
counsel for the accused person/petitioner argued that petitioner is in judicial
lock up and he is no more required for further investigation; he is non-convict
and non-record holder; allegation against him is baseless. No recovery was affected
from him. Hence, he be released on bail.
He has relied on PLJ 2009 Cr.C, 2007 MLD
1067 and PLD 1995 Supreme Court 34.
4. Learned
ADPP, assisted by learned counsel for the complainant, vehemently opposed the
bail petition in hand and prayed for its dismissal. Learned counsel for the
complainant has argued that petitioner is specifically nominated in the FIR; he
is hardened, criminal; he is not entitled for concession of bail.
5. Arguments
heard. Record perused.
6. Accused
person is specifically nominated in FIR.
Recovery of alleged weapon of offence has also been affected from him. Specific
role of causing injury punishable U/S 337-F-V. Thus, I am not inclined to grant
the concession of bail to the accused person/petitioner. Hence, petition in hand is dismissed. However, my these observations are of
tentative nature which shall not prejudice the disposal of the case on merits.
Announced
(
date)
(Name)
Magistrate
Ist Class
(City)
No comments:
Post a Comment