POLICE REPORT IN WRONG CALLS

Pre arrest bail on wrong calls
lal etc. Versus The State
Case FIR No. Offences Police Station
25-D Telegraph Act
Present Accused/petitioner along with his counsel.
DDPP for state.
1. Brief facts as alleged in the FIR lodged at the instance of complainant are that the petitioner and co-accused through mobile phone calls threatened to kill the complainant.
2. I have heard the arguments and perused the record.
3. Any date and time of alleged threatening phone calls is not disclosed in FIR. The police opinion vide diary No. 5 dated 13.01.2015 is that the complainant owed money to petitioner etc. only exchange of hot words on telephone took place between the parties over monetary dispute and any threats were not extended. It appears that petitioner is implicated in the case falsely. The petition is granted and ad-interim pre arrest bail already granted to the petitioner is confirmed subject to furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned learned Magistrate within seven days from today. Copy of this order be sent to the concerned court. File be consigned to the record room after its due completion.
Announced
.2015
Additional Sessions Judge