Harassment order
2014
Present Petitioner along with his counsel.
It is maintained in the petition that respondent No.3 to 6 who are ex-in-laws of petitioner are threatening the petitioner. That case FIR u/s under section 452 PPC/ 25-D Telegraph Act was registered at Police Station in this regard at the instance of father in law of the petitioner but said respondents are harassing the petitioner and the local police is in connivance with them.
I have heard the arguments and perused the record.
The petition is disposed off with the direction to respondents No.1 and 2 to ensure that any illegal harassment is not caused to petitioner by them. File be consigned to the record room after its due completion.
Announced
Additional Sessions Judge
.
2014
Present Petitioner along with his counsel.
It is maintained in the petition that respondent No.3 to 6 who are ex-in-laws of petitioner are threatening the petitioner. That case FIR u/s under section 452 PPC/ 25-D Telegraph Act was registered at Police Station in this regard at the instance of father in law of the petitioner but said respondents are harassing the petitioner and the local police is in connivance with them.
I have heard the arguments and perused the record.
The petition is disposed off with the direction to respondents No.1 and 2 to ensure that any illegal harassment is not caused to petitioner by them. File be consigned to the record room after its due completion.
Announced
Additional Sessions Judge
.

No comments:
Post a Comment